The Greatness of Little Things

wgsn:

We love UK company Marwood’s mix of masculine and feminine in their beautiful range of lace neck ties and bow ties.




retro swimsuit 


Perfect bathing suit. Need.

retro swimsuit 

Perfect bathing suit. Need.

businessoffashion:

Photo Diary | 10 Fashion Moments at London Fashion Week
Just when you thought London Fashion Week had reached it’s apogée,  along came another stellar season of shows from London-based designers  who are setting the pace for fashion around the world with their vibrant  digital prints, cutting-edge development techniques, and kooky  concoctions and accessories.
All the while, our favourite roving backstage photographer, Morgan  O’Donovan, was documenting the backstage scene. We’ve selected the  ten unforgettable fashion moments that defined London Fashion Week for  Autumn/Winter 2012.

businessoffashion:

Photo Diary | 10 Fashion Moments at London Fashion Week

Just when you thought London Fashion Week had reached it’s apogée, along came another stellar season of shows from London-based designers who are setting the pace for fashion around the world with their vibrant digital prints, cutting-edge development techniques, and kooky concoctions and accessories.

All the while, our favourite roving backstage photographer, Morgan O’Donovan, was documenting the backstage scene. We’ve selected the ten unforgettable fashion moments that defined London Fashion Week for Autumn/Winter 2012.

(Source: backstagefirstlooks)

wgsn:

New documentary Room 237 is a definitive guide to all the theories surrounding Stanley Kubrick’s horror masterpiece The Shining. Essential viewing for fans of the film and Stephen King’s original book too. Great hand painted poster.

wgsn:

New documentary Room 237 is a definitive guide to all the theories surrounding Stanley Kubrick’s horror masterpiece The Shining. Essential viewing for fans of the film and Stephen King’s original book too. Great hand painted poster.

wgsn:

Some of our favourite Etro looks at #mfw

utnereader:

When you fall in love, it’s all about what you have in common, and  you can hardly imagine that there are differences, let alone that you  will quarrel over them, or weep about them, or be torn apart by them—or  if all goes well, struggle, learn, and bond more strongly because of,  rather than despite, them. The Occupy movement had its glorious  honeymoon when old and young, liberal and radical, comfortable and  desperate, homeless and tenured all found that what they had in common  was so compelling the differences hardly seemed to matter.
Until they did.
Revolutions are always like this: at first all men are brothers  and anything is possible, and then, if you’re lucky, the romance of  that heady moment ripens into a relationship, instead of a breakup, an  abusive marriage, or a murder-suicide. Occupy had its golden age, when  those who never before imagined living side-by-side with homeless people  found themselves in adjoining tents in public squares.
All sorts of other equalizing forces were present, not least the police brutality that battered the privileged the way that inner-city kids are used to  being battered all the time. Part of what we had in common was what we  were against: the current economy and the principle of insatiable greed  that made it run, as well as the emotional and economic privatization  that accompanied it.
This is a system that damages people, and its devastation was  on display as never before in the early months of Occupy and related  phenomena like the “We are the 99%” website.  When it was people facing foreclosure, or who’d lost their jobs, or  were thrashing around under avalanches of college or medical debt, they  weren’t hard to accept as us, and not them.
And then came the people who’d been damaged far more, the  psychologically fragile, the marginal, and the homeless—some of them  endlessly needy and with a huge capacity for disruption. People who had  come to fight the power found themselves staying on to figure out available mental-health resources, while others who had  wanted to experience a democratic society on a grand scale found  themselves trying to solve sanitation problems.
And then there was the violence.
Keep reading Rebecca Solnit’s essay, “Mad, Passionate Love—and Violence” …

utnereader:

When you fall in love, it’s all about what you have in common, and you can hardly imagine that there are differences, let alone that you will quarrel over them, or weep about them, or be torn apart by them—or if all goes well, struggle, learn, and bond more strongly because of, rather than despite, them. The Occupy movement had its glorious honeymoon when old and young, liberal and radical, comfortable and desperate, homeless and tenured all found that what they had in common was so compelling the differences hardly seemed to matter.

Until they did.

Revolutions are always like this: at first all men are brothers and anything is possible, and then, if you’re lucky, the romance of that heady moment ripens into a relationship, instead of a breakup, an abusive marriage, or a murder-suicide. Occupy had its golden age, when those who never before imagined living side-by-side with homeless people found themselves in adjoining tents in public squares.

All sorts of other equalizing forces were present, not least the police brutality that battered the privileged the way that inner-city kids are used to being battered all the time. Part of what we had in common was what we were against: the current economy and the principle of insatiable greed that made it run, as well as the emotional and economic privatization that accompanied it.

This is a system that damages people, and its devastation was on display as never before in the early months of Occupy and related phenomena like the “We are the 99%” website. When it was people facing foreclosure, or who’d lost their jobs, or were thrashing around under avalanches of college or medical debt, they weren’t hard to accept as us, and not them.

And then came the people who’d been damaged far more, the psychologically fragile, the marginal, and the homeless—some of them endlessly needy and with a huge capacity for disruption. People who had come to fight the power found themselves staying on to figure out available mental-health resources, while others who had wanted to experience a democratic society on a grand scale found themselves trying to solve sanitation problems.

And then there was the violence.

Keep reading Rebecca Solnit’s essay, “Mad, Passionate Love—and Violence” …